Ave Maria, gratia plena, Dominus tecum; benedicta tu in

mulieribus, et benedictus fructus ventris tui, Jesus.

Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora pro nobis peccatoribus, nunc at in hora mortis nostrae.

Amen

It is clear, that as the world of the Catholic Church under the “leadership” of anti-Pope Bergoglio is getting more and more crazy, so does the politics out there. It used to be that the population of our civilization was divided under certain customs into classes and categories, if we like it or not. Classical division is of course the class of the Nobles, and the Plebs. These days the entirely new division is in play, never before seen in the history of the civilized humanity. The logical people and the class of morons. Interestingly it has nothing to do with the economic well being. It is spread equally through all economics classes. It is truth that in the past the Nobles were considerably better educated than the Plebs, but the new paradigm clearly eliminated that distinction. Actually the “stupid” or “brain wrecked” is more common in the ruling class, which is considerably richer than average working stiff, and so they went to the prestigious miss-educational “Ivy – League” institutions.

Funny part is that yes, occasionally, rather rarely there were some bad kings (try to name them? Not many) and Dukes etc, and they all ended up badly, but never before in history the entire ruling class was so corrupted, immoral,  and imbecilic as it is today. What is truly interesting is the fact that the class of plebeians did it to themselves from a great part. They got fooled into embracing the biggest Satanic lie …..the democracy.

Now they are incredibly surprised with the result, saying that the democracy was usurped by the …. enter here anybody you could possibly blame for it.  Not a clue that the democracy actually works like a charm. There is nothing wrong with it, it works as advertised. And yes, it will inevitably end as it always did; in the incredible tyranny and bloodshed. Only give it enough time. We see the final stages of this “democratic” insanity. Yet babbling idiots out there, all the talking heads and politicians still talking how they are going to FIX democracy.

MORONS!

But try to explain this one to an average brain wrecked Canadian……impossible. It is very visible here in Alberta, one time the bastion of sanity in the Peoples Dominion of Canuckistan. They just cannot get such a simple principle into heir heads; yes, even the stupid people, or people without any property, as not paying taxes, (meaning the actual contribution, not getting more in social programs than paying into it, 60% of the population are what one could call TAKERS and only 40% are MAKERS)  have the right to vote, but they should have this right only when it comes to governing of their very own affairs. Sadly, in democracy they are voting about the money, and so lives, of others. Of course, in any society there is more stupid than smart. So, guess, who will inevitably win the elections? After all your precious democracy is just a game of numbers. It is a mathematical and practical impossibility that the smart people would ever prevail. Just look at the immoral morons who get elected into an office elections after elections. SURPRISE!!!!!! That is a basic reason why in the past the western Civilization was going places, and now it cannot even cross the street without help of a chicken.

So, now you calmed down, your socialist heart stopped palpitating. So, it is time to think using that strange thing we call the logic. …………. is it still upsetting? Or you find some simple logic in that proposition.

For the average socialist Westerner, it is very difficult to comprehend that we are not, and never will be equal. Not even in front of God. He did not create us equal. That is why I am 220Lb chunk of meat, not exactly a ballerina type. Not that I had any ambitions to become one. But, what if?

And so, these days the big thing in Alberta is the unification of two socialist parties. The Conservative (in the name only), and the lesser NDP we call the Wild Rose party, as wildly socialist. But do not tell their executive, they might get offended.

Yes, it is a good step forward, also nowhere near the solution to our problem. For that we have to make sure that the new entity will be truly held accountable. And it will not be the idiotic immoral socialist Grass Root Movement (GRM). Once for all we should put that stupid idea to rest….no, into the nearest garbage can.

Maybe I should explain again; If the policies of the party would come from the floor, or GRM, and the majority of Albertans are solidly immoral/socialists, guess what kind of policies you will end up with. Again, it is the game of numbers. The democracy could never loose on its relentless march to socialism. Majority will always prevail. Enjoy.

Hence this might be the intermediate step, but if the “severely normal” people would not succeed to take over this “new” United Conservative party, and clean all socialists out, there will be rather serious need to start a truly new party. The party built on the strictly Catholic principles. Part where the policies must comply with the teachings of the true Catholic Church (not the fake Bergoglio’s LGBT faggot club), will be written by the selected morally exemplary, and smart people. Only the people who would voluntarily comply with those policies would be admitted as members. This position would have to be defended at all cost. After all, if somebody would agree only with some policies, he could always find himself a better party, the one which would agree with him. The same principle shall apply as the true catholic Church had for millennia’s …..wait the minute it was actually that guy we call God, who established those rules, such as; There is no 60% Catholic. You are, or you are not. No discussion allowed. That of course raises the interesting question; “how many actual Catholics are there anyway?

It is clear that this mess is the result of disappearance of logical/rational thinking in the population in general, but especially among lefties.

Lefties always tend to present two directly opposing propositions, yet they expect you to accept both without any reservation. Sadly, as I am observing during my last 34 years in this country, the acceptance is more and more common.

Proposition;

1.       The western Civilization is horribly bad on any level

2.       But everybody wants to get in and it is our duty to let them in

So, let me see. We are racist, homophobe, islamophobe, white male privileged bastards, but they still would like to live with us. Are they masochists? Shouldn’t they have built instead their own superior to ours civilization?  If their country and culture is equal if not superior to ours, why exactly are they coming in droves over  here?

3.       They all learning how to play Beethoven and Bach, they like our goodies

4.       But their culture is apparently superior to ours

Just like we supposed to learn from our Indians, the stone age people who did not know the wheel or iron before we came here, but we shall learn from them? What exactly?

5.       We are overpopulated to the point we the western wretches, we are destroying this planet

6.       But we need more immigration from every basket case hell hole on this planet.

To do what? More earthly destruction? Aren’t we going to make from them dreaded consumers?

7.       We are still teaching kids in school that plants, our food, cannot grow without CO₂, we cannot stay alive without CO₂ since it causes your lungs to exhale.

8.       We declared CO₂ to be poisonous gas which is going to destroy life on this planet.

OK, that is just too insane…. wait a minute! How come most of Canucks/ westerners accepted   all these idiocies without as much as whimper?

It was at first used by the Soviets, from the good old “Lenin school of political warfare” to confuse Westerners. But they are applying it to themselves voluntarily every day. Crazy isn’t it. And they think to be winners of the “Cold War” …. morons. Once you shoot God/Logos from your life it is rather natural progress to insanity.

Comrades from good old KGB, in the time of glory were using only 15% of their total budget on actual spying. The rest of hard earned soviet currency went to finance the political/ideological subversion (PIS). One of course has to realise that you cannot possibly be successful with this plan of PIS unless your target is a willing participant. And in the la-La-land of the West they found a target rich environment ever since 1930s.  It is evident that we are moving to the finals; even Americans are starting to realize that things are not as they were presented to them. Canadians as always are bit behind. I found it very interesting that, considering a simple fact that Soviets never kept their plan of Ideological Subversion in secret, so few in the West have clue, but finally it is changing. There are a few who actually opened their eyes and look into the history for the truth. What they found scared the living lights out of them. It is a horrible realization to find out that you were lied to whole your life. You see, for us, the rejects of the Soviet Empire it is rather easy. We grew up with it, we do not expect anything else. That is why we have a better chance to see bullshit when it comes around. And in the last 34 years living in the Canuckistan I cannot help but being amazed how little is needed to fool average Canadian and American. They actually believe that they won the Cold war, and funniest of them all; they think themselves to be FREE CITIZENS. That is simply hilarious. But who would listen to the old former commie when you could have it from your own;

https://youtu.be/gdXXEm7swus

https://youtu.be/5ZWU2TMjNTA

The gentlemen in second video especially is on the right track; The Soviets always considered the Catholic Church to be the enemy numero uno. No, not the USA with their biggest and best equipped army….. the Catholic Church. They understood that the true wars are not won on the battlefield in some Crapistan. The true war for world domination is fought, and won in the heads of people. The IDEOLOGICAL SUBVERSION. That is why they won the Cold war, that is why the whole formerly civilized world is now deeply socialists/Marxist. They knew that you have to first destroy the founding Religion/Ideology/ Philosophy (RIP) of the Western Civilization. Hence the destruction of the Catholic Church through the complete infiltration with socialist hacks and faggots. When it comes to the Protestant US of A, they held the mantra; They are Protestant, give them enough time, help a bit with PIS, and they will destroy themselves. And so how it is looking to you presently? Who was right? Those chests pounding Amuricans/Canuckistanies, or the old Soviet “garda”.

https://youtu.be/oa7ksjc2nLc

The saddest part is that Westerners have nobody to really blame. There was no gun pointing to their heads. They did it to themselves as willing participants. Now of course they are lost, not a clue as what might be a solution. The real solution would scare living lights ( of course LED to be enviro-friendly) out of them. As for the Church ???!!!??? Only an act of God could possibly fix that mess. Of course the reality is; NO CATHOLIC CHURCH, NO WESTERN CIVILIZATION.

ENJOY!

Kyrie eleison

Christe eleison

Kyrie eleison

 Deus Vult

Your Truth My Truth

As soon as someone says something along the lines of, "well.....that may be true for you......but......" you can rest assured that you are probably dealing with an idiot, and if not an idiot per se, at minimum you are dealing with someone who is trained to think like an idiot.  And no, this is not an ad hominem, I actually mean to use the dictionary definition of the word idiot: "a stupid person / a mentally handicapped person".

What good is it calling a person an idiot in regards to this statement?  Wouldn't it be more constructive to offer a criticism of the silly idea that people can have two different truths?  A critique will follow shortly, but it is important to recognize when dealing with someone who has a pathology (idiocy) so that you can be better prepared to talk to them.  You would want to know if you were talking to someone with autism because you may choose to communicate differently.  You would want to know if you were entering into a relationship with a sociopath because you would try and keep them at a distance.  You would want to be aware of someone's addictions, or co-dependency issues or whatever may ail them before getting too far into a relationship with them.  Being aware of what affects a person helps you build strategies to have a healthier relationship with them and increases the chances of having a positive affect on them.  (Also, as a disclaimer, I am not saying that having autism or another disability is the same thing as being a sociopath or an idiot.  The common thing between them all is that knowing what the disability is helps in future interactions.)

The same goes for the person who says "that may be true for you".  They are an idiot.  They can't be properly reasoned with because they have isolated their mind from the truth.  A mind isolated from the truth is a sick thing.  They suffer from a mental, or rather, an intellectually illness.  If truth-replacements (lies) are then fed to the mind, the mind becomes delusional and ill. Now, if a person who is starved and then fed poison, you wouldn't expect them to be able to play hockey or rugby well.  You also wouldn't enter into a rational debate with a mentally ill person without addressing the mental illness first.  An intellectually ill person is much the same, yet we must remember that an intellectual illness isn't physical in the same way as a bodily illness or a mental illness caused from an imbalance in brain chemistry.  An intellectual illness is due to an insane belief, that is, a belief that doesn't correspond to reality.  We can get by with some false beliefs, for to some degree or other the vast majority of people suffer from human weakness of intellect due to sin, but there are some that are so fundamental that they must be correct for us to be correct about anything.  The intellectual illness that I have in mind attacks such a belief.

What illness do these idiots suffer from?  In a word, relativism.  It is a philosophy in which there is no preferred direction, orientation, or truth yet that is the preferred direction, orientation, or truth.  In other words, the central claim of relativism is that it is true that there is no truth.  There are those, and I would include most in this category, who naively and rather innocently believe this statement.  However, you sometimes get very sophisticated versions of this idiocy.  After all, you have to be really smart to rationalize the most stupid things and absolutely overflowing with pride to believe them.  Just like successful con artists are incredibly intelligent in manufacturing their lies, so too is the relativist philosopher who comes up with a complex belief system that hides a simple and obvious contradiction.  A complex belief system that is in itself a self-inflicted con.  You have to be very smart, albeit completely bereft of wisdom.

Think of an alcoholic.  As they begin to drink it is often fun for them, they may drink more than others, but it isn't ruining their life outright.  As time goes on however, and people start pointing out the problems with their drinking, the alcoholic has to come up with more and more sophisticated lies and manipulations to believe that they don't have a problem with drinking and that the problem lies elsewhere.  Much like an addict is able to rationalize and justify their poor behaviour by blaming everyone and everything else for their condition, so too does the relativist find every reason under the sun to hold to their relativity.

When backed into a corner to say whether or not something is true, the relativist needs to become a very flexible intellectual acrobat to be able to make claims about reality while claiming that there is no way to make accurate claims about reality.  If a person claims that there is no way to say that there is a superior culture, and you ask them about cannibalistic cultures, they have to go through a long winded discussion about values and socially constructed rights to avoid saying that some things are morally reprehensible regardless of your culture while also saying that they don't support cannibalism.  If a person says that they themselves would never get an abortion while they wouldn't stop someone else from getting one, they have to find all sorts of ways to avoid the science that proves that a baby is a baby even in the womb while trying to claim they support medical science and talk about women's rights while avoiding talking about the baby's rights even if they are female.

It truly is a sickness and people are dying because of it!  So when you are talking to a relativist you can not talk about anything until you have helped them find a cure to their idiocy.  What is the cure?  A healthy dose of humility followed by a heaping serving of truth.  If they can keep that down, they may still have a chance to enter into a healthy discussion.

After all, what is the point of saying anything if it isn't to make some sort of truth claim?